|
Because planning in the NPS includes several distinct
stages and types of decisions that involve different scales, the levels
of detail in each will vary. When plans are conceptual, such as in the
general management plan, the NEPA analysis may be comparably conceptual.
Ultimately, however, a decision-maker must have site-specific information
before a plan can be implemented (e.g., the ground disturbed, the resource
changed). The following are some options for collecting
this site-specific information:
- Collect it as part of the
EIS on a general management or other large-scale plan. Because funding
to implement the plan may be delayed, you may need to update site-specific
analysis several times for the same proposal. The advantages of this
approach are that decisions made at the planning stage will be more
fully informed, and future NEPA work to implement the plan may be minimized,
unless data and planning decisions have become outdated by the time
the plan is implemented.
- Collect reconnaissance-level
information to make broad policy and planning decisions. Collect site-specific
information to assess implementation options as funding becomes available.
The site-specific NEPA document may then be tiered (see
section 7.4) to the EIS
for the broader plan.
- Identify zoned areas within the plan that
are likely to be designated for visitor use facilities based on reconnaissance-level
data. Collect site-specific data for the smaller developable areas as
an element of the plan.
|
|
Because planning in the NPS includes several distinct
stages and types of decisions that involve different scales, the levels
of detail in each will vary. When plans are conceptual, such as in the
general management plan, the NEPA analysis may be comparably conceptual.
Ultimately, however, a decision-maker must have site-specific information
before a plan can be implemented (e.g., the ground disturbed, the resource
changed). The following are some options for collecting
this site-specific information:
- Collect it as part of the
EIS on a general management or other large-scale plan. Because funding
to implement the plan may be delayed, you may need to update site-specific
analysis several times for the same proposal. The advantages of this
approach are that decisions made at the planning stage will be more
fully informed, and future NEPA work to implement the plan may be minimized,
unless data and planning decisions have become outdated by the time
the plan is implemented.
- Collect reconnaissance-level
information to make broad policy and planning decisions. Collect site-specific
information to assess implementation options as funding becomes available.
The site-specific NEPA document may then be tiered (see
section 7-4) to the EIS for the broader plan.
- Identify zoned areas within
the plan that are likely to be designated for visitor use facilities
based on reconnaissance-level data. Collect site-specific data for the
smaller developable areas as an element of the plan.
Always
include data on impacts to the park's significant natural and cultural
resources and values (as defined by the park's enabling legislation and
other relevant sources of information); to interpretive, educational,
and recreational opportunities; to resources protected by federal, state,
or local laws; and to other relevant resources in your park or region.
Also see DO-12 section IV (4.3
and 4.4) regarding integration
of proper technical and scientific studies appropriate to the decisions
under consideration.
Further Links:
See Sections
4.5 and 4.6
NPOMA
section 206
Guidance
on Administrative Record
Guidance
to Client Agencies on Compiling the Administrative Record
<<Return
to previous section
Continue
to next section>>
Return to top of page
|